[Dogra]

The article in ET prime is written by Varsha Santosh. Varsha WHO? One can search Linkedin. I wouldnt glorify an “opinion” and open ended article from a nobody – ” stellar returns or just a mirage?”. She is questioning our company. And many like her are. So, the real question for me is – who really posed the assignment – ” How can you save some stupid retailers from BCG scam? Remember Sucheta Dalal? Good luck!” Mounting debt? Serously? Who proof read and gave a go for the article to be published.
One just needs to compare TTD, APPS with BCG. The business constraints are similar if not the same.
On top, our company also likes to inflict injuries to itself.
I have just one thing to say to SKR if I ever meet him (maybe I will soon) – You have a once in a lifetime opportunity. Dont blow it up with procedural/communication lapses. 28th May D-day! Time to shine.

[Dogra]

Great example. Logan, you are describing what an impairment charge actually means in accounting terms. Essentially, a depreciation expense on steroids. Doing it in one go as is the example of DVD players. Redundant tech. And yes, disney, HBO.. etc. will have to adapt.

[Dogra]

Hi all, First of all a great forum and thanks. I have been peeking on and off. I am invested since a while. Thought its a dud but hung on. But, I feel NOW the time has come for BCG.
Anyways, I have a suggestion. BACKGROUND-
The first place one most likely goes to search for a compny is Wikipedia. If you read through the current page – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brightcom_Group
what does one notice? Its INCOMPLETE and perhaps misleading too. This forum has far more relevant info with right reasons for our company’s historical legacy.
I asked a few people to go through the wiki page ( who did not know BCG) and posed a simple question. Would you invest? To my surprise many (9/11) said NO. 2/11 said maybe without even checking the current status. But why?, I will sum up the answers –
1. Seems like they change their business a lot and we have not heard of these names.
2. They have been bankrupt, in legal troubles
3. Only 483 people? Thats a lot of revenue for a 483 employee company.
I asked to the NO group to check the financials on screener. And asked once more.
They were too sceptical already and mostly did not bother anymore. And it was beer time too.
Anyways, I thought why not improve the wiki page with the correct facts and information already available on this forum. We could coordinate with the company if needed. And trollers cannot misrepresent our company like they do on twitter/mmb etc. More importantly we give a good starting point to someone new/big who is interested in BCG.
What do you think?
Compare the language used for TTD
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trade_Desk
I understand that it may sound silly but, not everyone has researched BCG inside out. Some people just need to be spoon fed in the begining. My suggestion for improving the visibility of our company.

[Author]

Posts