108BULLGURU

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 201 through 220 (of 482 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Technically speaking #3230
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    there was no supply in the las t down move. all coooked up. there will be no sellers. One got to have rocks in the head to sell till fair market value is realised. Some pea nut munchers may get out in between but UCS should continue.
    Stock is only in very strong hands.
    well most of it.

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3226
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    “My sense says…this could be just to compensate those people who have lost their holdings during the price moved downwards!”

    exactly my thoughts during last 2 hours. telepathy i realized when i read this message. so many biggies lost so much shares to you and me.
    so being compensated.
    now.

    If any one thinks there will be any more dillution of equity,they are kidding themself in my views.
    OAK’s holding my go to a top investment bank or a big name when they want to sell. is my guess.
    nothing else.That is likely to happen after 5-6 months at a very high perice i think.
    No more new shares.

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3202
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    could be heading now fast forward motion to fair market price.
    no let up from UCS.
    They realised they are not getting any shares any more. This muskaan ltd seems like a tax heavan in Mauritius. some one may be using it could be the sharks at the top.
    Those who sold out are done. hard to get in now.

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3199
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    WOW Muskaan limited in Mauritius.
    check this link.
    https://opencorporates.com/companies/mu/C48043
    Kishan prakash
    ishan prakash
    sounds like some purnay papai
    some old timers of BCG holders.
    Comments please.

    1+
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3188
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    All good.
    Because of many reasons fear takes over investors and we even forget lot of positive things that we have already known.
    It confirms my original thesis due to which i kept on avergaging down “THAT TRUE PICTURE OF BCG IS NOT COMING OUT DUE TO DAUM ISSUE AND ALL THE REVENUE PERFORMANCE ETC IS NEAR OK”
    So once daum is sealed it will all be made public.Y

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3184
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    Hi every one,
    All this ewill be made clear and become public only AFTER DAUM IS SIGNED AND SEALED.
    That is the only reason in my opinion that things keep getting delayed in term of actions to us on all other matters where as they may already be near complete.
    Think about it.
    If U were a company with 3200 crore net assetts and Daum wanted it all what will U do???
    Wink wink wink.
    BCG kay galay ki haddi hai DAUM/LYCOS settlement.
    when signed sealed and paid.
    rocket will be fired…

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3180
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    Hi every one,
    All this ewill be made clear and become public only AFTER DAUM IS SIGNED AND SEALED.
    That is the only reason in my opinion that things keep getting delayed in term of actions to us on all other matters where as they may already be near complete.
    Think about it.
    If U were a company with 3200 crore net assetts and Daum wanted it all what will U do???
    Wink wink wink.

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3179
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    The fully ownbed subsidiary of BCG that owns BRIGHTCOM israel brand is owned by the company thta is in Tel Aviv.SKR i think even told the name of the company that owns the brightcom israel

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3171
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    AGREED.
    But,
    here is the point.
    Hi Acerforce,
    Thanks for reminding us all about this.
    It all makes sense why BCG is not up;loading that info because trhey dont want to give unnecessary info to Daum to benefit them.
    So it gives me more confidence in believing that nmbers may be fine and SKR is trying to protect the interests of the sharehoilders.
    He does not have to provide these details to Daum as these companies did not buyLy cos. wink wink. do U get the point.
    So he is under advice not to provide this info..
    Load up freinds load up as much as U can.
    Some long term investors suspect that numbers and actual position may be far better than what is known or declared.
    WOW.

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3169
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    Hi Acerforce,
    Thanks for reminding us all about this.
    It all makes sense why BCG is not up;loading that info because trhey dont want to give unnecessary info to Daum to benefit them.
    So it gives me more confidence in believing that nmbers may be fine and SKR is trying to protect the interests of the sharehoilders.
    He does not have to provide these details to Daum as these companies did not buyLy cos. wink wink. do U get the point.
    So he is under advice not to provide this info..
    Load up freinds load up as much as U can.
    Some long term investors suspect that numbers and actual position may be far better than what is known or declared.
    WOW.

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3164
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    “But who knows how many companies he ( BCG ) actually owns… as for Brightcom Israel, they are independent.”
    SKR is on record last conf call in very clear terms that BRIGTCOM ISRAEL is fyully owned 100% by a subsidiary of BCG. Brightcom Israel is a brand in Israel and not a company in itself,. company that owns Brightcom iSRAEL is a different company.

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3162
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    Indian auditors have said every year that they have presented the reports on the basis of signed statements by the management about those foreign subsidiaries.There is no mentio n any where about those subsuidiaries being audited and by whom.
    Howver i think SKR did say some thing some where in some conf call that so and so … foreign subsidiaries were already being audited by one of the big fours….Not sure what % .

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3158
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    My only thinking is that if all these numbers are totally cooked then how could he buy so many companies and even brightcom Israel and even 100 milion plus USD loan in the past.

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3154
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    WOW.
    Nice.
    so my thinking that BCG should be 500-1000 some where for is correct

    0
    in reply to: General Discussion #3151
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator

    Dear every one knows the reason. They could disappear quickly in coming few months
    if SKR delivers on what he
    said during last conf call.
    Then who knows
    300-500 ,100 i have no idea what market will do.
    Markets are a crazy place and can turn on a dime.
    Look at AFFLE 1700 WAS the high.
    BCG already delivering nearly 1 million USD rev per employee means should be selling beween 600-1000 rupee per piece of BCG SHARE WHEN u LSO CONSIDER margins and net pft .eps etc etc…

    0
    in reply to: General Discussion #3142
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator

    dear investors do U realize that on 2500 crores of revenue and 400 employees revenue per employee is 1 million USD approx.
    This stock should be selling at 50-100 PE ratio. who is kidding whom.
    Market thinks it i worth a zero.
    U B the judge

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3141
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    Most of the companies that have bought millions of shars of BCG
    are declared financial intermediaries as companies on public sites.
    These are holding hundred million shares .
    so who owns them in reality.
    Have a think.
    It is not so simple.
    What appears on the surface is not the reality.
    Go check these companies like UNO and akg etcetc and what is their business.

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3139
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    well one thing is clear.Retail is not selling and wise ones have added when they got the opportunity.
    That is what may have prolonged the drama here
    as sharks have not been able to break the will of retail after years.

    0
    in reply to: General Discussion #3136
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator

    @Odysee.
    Thanks dear for clarifying it.
    It is good to know that there was no malafide intent which has been recorded in the decision that no material impact on shareholders.
    If it was just an oversight.
    Or just poor coporrate governance and following up on officve procedures.
    Market does not seem to be too bothered about it.
    Gr8.
    all good.

    0
    in reply to: Technically speaking #3132
    108BULLGURU
    Spectator
    Topic Author

    No real volume fro m down move 700 to 540. except block deals.
    Retail holding their stock very close to their chest
    and that is really frustrating the big guys and the operators.

    0
Viewing 20 posts - 201 through 220 (of 482 total)